
14 Nov 2025
Welcome to our weekly newsletter, where we summarise market activity over the past seven days.
Market Weekly
Market Weekly

Reeves’ Budget Reset
The UK government’s autumn budget, scheduled for 26 November, is now being positioned differently after Chancellor Rachel Reeves reportedly abandoned earlier plans to raise headline income-tax rates. Reeves faces a delicate balancing act. Ensuring fiscal stability to plug a gap estimated at up to £30 billion, while staying true to manifesto promises and avoiding moves that could stifle growth. Every decision is scrutinised meticulously, leaving the Chancellor often treading on eggshells when setting policy.
Rumours recently emerged that Reeves would increase income tax by 2p and reduce employee National Insurance (NI) by the same amount, a shift projected to raise up to £6 billion. Treasury officials are reportedly still considering dozens of policy options – far more than in previous budgets – highlighting the fluidity and political sensitivity of decisions at this late stage.
What might fill the gap?
With headline income-tax hikes largely off the table, attention has shifted to the second tier of potential revenue-raisers. One proposal circulating in policy circles is a UK exit tax, levied on individuals who change tax residence to avoid future liabilities. Similar schemes exist in the US, Canada, and Germany, typically aimed at capturing unrealised gains before departure.
For the UK, an exit tax would be framed as a fairness levy targeting high-net-worth individuals relocating to low-tax jurisdictions. While politically attractive, the practical yield is likely modest and carries the risk of signalling a less open stance toward international wealth – a delicate message for a country seeking investment.
Other potential measures include:
Collectively, these approaches could help close the fiscal gap without breaching manifesto commitments.
Choppy Markets
October was strong for gilts as markets priced in expectations of potential rate cuts, following better-than-expected macroeconomic data. However, news of the U-turn and the prospect of last-minute budget decisions has unsettled investors over the past week.
The pound has dipped, and gilt yields have risen as markets digest the implications of weaker clarity around fiscal tightening. Markets react not only to policy changes themselves but also to uncertainty around signals – and the reversal of plans has reintroduced unease.
The FTSE has also fallen amid concerns that the “black hole” in public finances still needs plugging, potentially at the expense of businesses. Companies value certainty, as it enables better planning for investment, borrowing, and hiring. Conversely, calm gilt markets help maintain borrowing costs, sterling stability reduces imported inflationary pressures, and less fiscal unpredictability enhances margin visibility.
While an income-tax rise would have been mildly deflationary — explaining some initial market optimism – alternative measures such as VAT hikes could drive inflation higher. The U-turn has thus been reflected in lower equities, higher yields, and a weaker pound, reinforcing the idea that markets care more about clarity than the actual policy.
Looking Ahead
While the budget will still be politically significant – balancing manifesto commitments, internal party tensions and fiscal credibility – it is unlikely to reshape the broader investment or economic picture. For the immediate horizon:
The expected tax-framework may have shifted slightly with the U-turn meaning less overt pain for taxpayers now, but a similar fiscal-tightening path remains to manage the Chancellors fiscal headroom.
While the picture remains unclear, the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) forecasts have improved, broadly bolstering the outlook for the UK. This is more incremental for the wider economy than small tax tweaks, with growth expectations a large driver behind Reeve’s expected fiscal decisions. If the OBR signals that the UK is stuck in a low-growth environment, it forces Reeves into a cycle of continual tightening. If it signals improving productivity, the Chancellor gains fiscal headroom without touching tax rates at all.
Noise:
The Numbers
The Niche
Do you know what is meant when economists talk about ‘hawks’ and ‘doves’?
The terms hawks and doves in central banking were borrowed from Cold War politics. In the 1960s, foreign policy “hawks” pushed for tougher military action while “doves” urged restraint. As inflation battles heated up in the 1970s, economists grabbed the same labels: hawks to describe policymakers ready to attack rising prices, and doves for those preferring gentler, growth-friendly moves. Turns out bird metaphors fly pretty well across policy arenas.
Disclaimer
The information and opinion contained in this article should not be treated as a forecast, research or advice to buy or sell any particular investment or to adopt any investment strategy and are presented for information only. Any views expressed are based on information received from a variety of sources which we believe to be reliable but are not guaranteed as to accuracy or completeness by atomos. Any expressions of opinion are subject to change without notice.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. Investing involves risk and the value of investments, and the income from them, may fall as well as rise and is not guaranteed. Investors may not get back the original amount invested.
The value of investments and any income from them can fall and you may get back less than you invested.
The value of investments and any income from them can fall and you may get back less than you invested.